policraticus: (Default)
[personal profile] policraticus
Well, I have been slowly getting back into LJ after a summer of stress. It has been interesting. Tonight I decided I would post to the main board of _Debate_. A couple of threads had been discussing quizzes that tested your political leanings and I thought a specific site had some relevence to the general discussion. To wit, I posted this:

"john of salisbury (policraticus) wrote in debate,
@ 2003-11-17 22:51:00
        
A better political quiz (No offence, Kylebee)

_kylebee_ and _foobiwan_'s latest debates have prompted me to post this link to the main board. It is my first official main board post. I will accept either congratulations, condemnations or sympathy as you deem appropriate.

http://www.politicalcompass.org/

It is a nuanced and thoughtful site and I would be interested to see not only where you all stand, but whether you agree with the position the quiz gives you and whether you are surprised by the placement of others in the Debate community.

Debate:
RESOLVED: The Political Compass's assessment of _policraticus_ as Economic +3.25/Social -1.38 is fair.

I will take the affirmative stance. I'm a fairly moderate guy on social issues and lean to the right on economics. Not quite Milton Friedman, but no Nelson Mandela either.

(Oh great and mighty MODS, if this inappropriate, delete away.)"

Now, granted this was my first try, but I thought it yielded some interesting debate, especially around the actual debate, ie whether the Compass itself was fair. _whip lash_ and _crackmonkeyjr_ had a respectful and thoughtful discussion of libertarian philosophy. I did a little defense of the Political Compass's design and supposed slant. Various people chimed in with their results and opinions. Nothing worthy of LJdrama, nothing that would make it into _debateclassics_, but not a ZRP by any means. There were about 18 entries in about an hour, whatever that means.

Imagine my surprise when it was deleted without warning. I guess the moderators took my little aside at face value and deleted away. LOL.

I can't help but wonder what I did wrong, though. The debate was phrased properly, to my mind, and the responses were to the point, for the most part. ::shrugs::

Its a den of hungry lions.

Date: 2003-11-19 03:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fieldofshells.livejournal.com
Its a den of hungry lions.

More like a lair idiot dragons lately, but I digress.

Date: 2003-11-19 04:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] policraticus.livejournal.com
Hoot!

Fuck you! I'm a Romanesque Statue!

Date: 2003-11-19 04:23 am (UTC)

Profile

policraticus: (Default)
policraticus

January 2017

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
1516171819 2021
22232425262728
293031    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 22nd, 2017 03:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios